Are search engines really killing content? A brief review of the history of search engines and their impact on the Web will be an eye opener.
Search engine algorithms were designed with only two concepts in mind–the frequency of keywords and the linking between pages.
The first algorithm aims to index the relevance of pages on the basis of statistical frequency of the keywords that users may input into the search engine. They were not concerned with the quality of the pages being indexed or the intrinsic value of the content that is to be found on these pages. The higher the frequency of a keyword, the higher the relevance of the page. So keyword stuffing and spamdexing became the order of the day. Of course, Google is trying to get round this problem with its new algorithms.
The second type of algorithm was designed to analyze the way web pages link with each other on the web. This algorithm aims to find out whether the page is considered relevant on the web and if the linked pages has similar keywords etc , so that the rank of the page can be determined vis a vis other similar pages on the web. Here too, the intrinsic value of the page content is irrelevant.
It is therefore, no wonder that the web user is often frustrated when he finds that pages that have been ranked high on the search engine result page contain nothing but a list of keywords scattered over the page or has just rubbish in the place of the information he is looking for. It follows, content and information are not taken into consideration by the all powerful search engine algorithms that influences users choice of which websites to visit! In this context, it must be admitted that search engines seem to be killing content.
Increasing commoditization of content demands that brand value content be distinguished from mediocre or rubbishy content. What is the mechanism to be adopted for this purpose? The future will be a witness to that!







